DODGERS NEWS/RUMORS Thread

Discussion in 'Los Angeles DODGERS' started by irish, Oct 12, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 1988Blues

    1988Blues DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 2013
    Messages:
    3,508
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Dodger Ownership is just a fucking joke. All talk and no action. Just mo money mo money mo money and to the fans in Dodger land Homey don’t play that with a big FU.
     
  2. 1988Blues

    1988Blues DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 2013
    Messages:
    3,508
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Jerking us off:lolwhoa:
     
    BlueMouse likes this.
  3. jpldodgers

    jpldodgers DSP Legend Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 2012
    Messages:
    20,580
    Likes Received:
    16,527
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Dodgers rumors make me chuckle.

    All talk, no action.
     
    BlueMouse likes this.
  4. BlueMouse

    BlueMouse 2020 World Champions

    Joined:
    Nov 2011
    Messages:
    12,445
    Likes Received:
    14,570
    Trophy Points:
    198
    If there was an award for “most trade rumors” we’d win every year.
     
    Finski and jpldodgers like this.
  5. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 2011
    Messages:
    53,286
    Likes Received:
    40,914
    Trophy Points:
    278
    Sources: Oscar Colás, 21, leaves Cuba with eyes on MLB contract
    by Jeff Passan |ESPN — 3 hours ago

    Outfielder/pitcher Oscar Colás, one of the best baseball talents to emerge from Cuba in recent years, has left the island and intends to sign a contract with a major league team, sources familiar with his plans tell ESPN.

    Colás, 21, spent most of the last three years in Japan, playing in the minor leagues for the Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks. He made his Japanese League debut in 2019 and homered in his first at-bat after hitting .300/.353/.511 as a 20-year-old in the highest level of the minors.

    At 6-foot-1, 210 pounds, Colás projects as a power-hitting left-handed outfielder, and could be a lefty pitcher as well. Scouts who have seen Colás in recent years question his ability to become a full-time, two-way player but said his fastball, which runs up to 95 mph, is of high enough quality to allow him to try to play both ways.

    The biggest question among teams who found out Friday of Colás' defection: When does he plan to sign? Much of the money from teams' hard-capped bonus pools in the 2019-20 international signing period has been spent, according to sources. If Colás wants the multi-million dollar bonus his talent warrants, he might have to wait until July 2, when the new international signing period begins and teams' bonus pools are refreshed, according to sources.

    Colás is not the only top-end talent available from Cuba. Right-hander Norge Carlos Vera, the 19-year-old son of longtime Cuban pitcher Norge Luis Vera, is expected to sign in July. And Yoelkis Cespedes, the 22-year-old brother of Mets outfielder Yoenis Cespedes, defected in June and could sign anytime.
     
  6. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 2011
    Messages:
    53,286
    Likes Received:
    40,914
    Trophy Points:
    278
    • The Giants have agreed to terms on a minor-league pact with veteran righty Tyson Ross, Bob Nightengale of USA Today reports on Twitter. He’ll earn at a $1.75MM rate in the majors with $1.75MM in available incentives.
    all but guaranteed this scrub goes 4-0 against us with a sub-1.00 era*





    *and 10.58 against the rest of the league...
     
    Finski likes this.
  7. ColoradoKidWitGame

    ColoradoKidWitGame DSP Legend Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 2013
    Messages:
    11,710
    Likes Received:
    10,087
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Don't expect the Dodgers to be in on him. Not a lot of money to spend and we are supposedly in on one of the top players already for the upcoming year.
     
    No Name and irish like this.
  8. No Name

    No Name Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2019
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    395
    Trophy Points:
    73
    He's not the Cuban that interests me anyways. I'd wait for Suzuki.
     
    Finski likes this.
  9. 1988Blues

    1988Blues DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 2013
    Messages:
    3,508
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Trophy Points:
    153
    About the only thing we win these days.
     
  10. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 2011
    Messages:
    53,286
    Likes Received:
    40,914
    Trophy Points:
    278
    from a chowd's perspective...


    The case for packaging Mookie Betts and David Price in a straight salary dump
    by John Tomase | NBC Sports Boston — 3 January 2020

    The idea sounds positively repellant on first blush -- package David Price and Mookie Betts to the Dodgers (because let's be realistic, it can only be the Dodgers) in a salary dump.

    No top-tier prospects. No impact players to give the Red Sox a chance in 2020. Just money coming off the books, and not all of it bad. How can a big-market team justify such a defeatist move when it negates the massive financial advantage the franchise holds over its rivals?

    But the more I think about it, the more I believe that not only is the concept of a package deal acceptable, but it's the best course of action the Red Sox can take.

    The reality is that trading Price alone, while making long-term financial sense, severely decreases the likelihood that the Red Sox will contend in 2020. He probably represents the safest bet among the trio of overpaid wild cards in the Red Sox rotation, and removing him means either adding another starter on par with the recently signed Martin Perez -- his next ERA below 5.00 will be his first in three years -- or turning to an opener.

    And if that's the case, the Red Sox need to be sensible about the wisdom of retaining Betts for a lost season that ends with the former MVP walking in free agency.

    As much as a win-now fan base might not want to hear it, the moves the Red Sox make this winter won't be about 2020, but whatever comes next as they address the organizational bloat that has left the franchise with the worst of both worlds -- an overpaid, underperforming roster.

    Betts isn't part of that problem. If Manny Machado, Bryce Harper, and Anthony Rendon are worth over $30 million annually, then Betts definitely is. Were the roster better-constructed, paying him his roughly $27 million in arbitration would be an easy decision, even at the risk that he simply plays out his contract and leaves.

    But let's be clear-eyed about the 2020 Red Sox. They're coming off an 84-win season and will be betting heavily on the column marked "chance" if they expect Price, Chris Sale, and Nathan Eovaldi to pitch effectively after watching the three combine for barely 300 innings while battling an assortment of injuries that required two surgeries to fix.

    I'm sympathetic to ownership's desire to drop the payroll below $208 million not because I care about John Henry's luxury tax payments -- he can afford them -- but because building a team under those constraints forces the implementation of a long-term plan that isn't simply, "Pay everyone."

    Since the Yankees started shedding payroll in 2016, they've won 91, 100, and 103 games. That put them in a position to address their biggest area of need -- ace -- with a record $324 million contract for free agent Gerrit Cole this winter.

    Given the well-documented unreliability of pitchers in their 30s, the Yankees may come to regret this deal as much as the one the Red Sox gave Price, but at least it fit a long-term vision.

    Between 2015 and 2018, the Dodgers lopped nearly $100 million of payroll. Since then, they've averaged 98 wins per season and reached a pair of World Series. They're now in a position to take on Betts and Price, should the Red Sox decide to sell.

    The merits of such a move are open to debate -- Price turns 35 in August and is still owed $96 million over the next three years -- but both moves once again fit a plan.

    Then there are the Red Sox. They committed over $400 million to three pitchers with varying degrees of reliability issues that have only worsened with time. They're paying All-Stars Xander Bogaerts and J.D. Martinez more than $20 million each (they're both worth it, by the way). They'd love to extend superstar-in-making Rafael Devers, but that can't happen unless they pare some serious payroll.

    The players knew where this was headed all season.

    "I think everyone knows we don't think they're going to be able to afford Mookie," Martinez told NBC Sports Boston on the last day of the season. "It's one of those things. It's kind of hard to have three guys making $30 million on your team. He deserves it. He's earned it."

    A case can be made that no player is worth a 10- or 12-year contract, because too much can go wrong. For all his obvious greatness, Betts stands only 5-9 and relies on lightning-quick wrists to generate power. Red Sox fans need no reminder of what can happen to a hitter when his wrists or hands go, as they learned with both Nomar Garciaparra, and to a lesser extent, Dustin Pedroia. Betts would be right to demand a 12-year, $400 million contract. The Red Sox would be equally justified in declining such a massive commitment.

    And so that brings us back to the dreaded salary dump. How can the Red Sox justify using Betts to force a team to take more of Price's salary? Easy: if including Betts means the Dodgers eat all $96 million of Price, the $16-$20 million in annual savings is more valuable than any mid-level prospect the Dodgers could realistically send in return (the Red Sox aren't getting top prospect Gavin Lux, for instance). Build a package around right-hander Tony Gonsolin and lesser prospects and make the Dodgers pay Price.

    Add the $27 million Betts would've made this year, and now you're positioned to extend Devers at an age (23) when he's much more likely to deliver value through every season of an eight-year deal.

    It would take guts on the part of chief baseball officer Chaim Bloom to make his first major move a straight salary dump, because if he deals Betts without receiving considerable talent in return, he's going to hear about it from irate fans.

    But let's call this what it is: an organizational rebuild. Those inevitably start with some painful decisions, and the Red Sox might as well not so much dive into that pool as a cannonball.
     
  11. No Name

    No Name Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2019
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    395
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Betts for a non top prospect and a salary dump is fine with me. Maybe David Price can pitch for the Dodgers Fortnight team and run their Twitter
     
    irish and rube like this.
  12. ColoradoKidWitGame

    ColoradoKidWitGame DSP Legend Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 2013
    Messages:
    11,710
    Likes Received:
    10,087
    Trophy Points:
    198
    It will be interesting to see how Japanese players approach the Dodgers and their FO in the years ahead. There is a lot made about honor with them and the way the Dodgers have treated Maeda the last couple years COULD have a negative impact on potential players coming in. Now, the Dodgers have notably tried to alter his contract so that his relief bonuses could match his starter ones, but it is something to keep an eye on since Kenta is said to be somewhat unhappy with the situation. Not saying this would happen here as the FO is very involved in scouting overseas, but these players have made decisions for odder reasons. i.e. there was a rumor that either Kikuchi or Ohtani would not sign anywhere that a former Japanese star was already playing to not overshadow them.
     
    irish and rube like this.
  13. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 2011
    Messages:
    53,286
    Likes Received:
    40,914
    Trophy Points:
    278
    Mike Krukow says Giants signing Yasiel Puig isn't a crazy thought
    by Jessica Kleinschmidt | NBC Sports Bay Area — 2 January 2020

    [​IMG]

    The thought of Yasiel Puig as a member of the Giants is ... weird. Or is it?

    With president of baseball operations Farhan Zaidi having a past with the Dodgers, it wouldn't be an acquisition out of left, or right field. It's certainly an intriguing thought, according to Mike Krukow.

    The Giants broadcaster stopped by KNBR on Thursday and didn't shut down the possibility of the Giants acquiring Puig.

    "Would I like to see Puig? I always thought 'I don't know about that," Krukow said. "He's energy, he's strength ... "

    Krukow then referred to a tweet by The San Francisco Chronicle's Henry Schulman that made Kruk smile and had him thinking -- well, why not?

    "Here's a guy that's got some credentials, got some power, got a great arm. How much fun would it be to watch that arm in right field?"

    The need for a power bat stretches across the league, but even more so for someone playing half of his games at the pitcher-friendly Oracle Park.

    Despite Giants fans not liking the former Dodger with extra pizazz, Zaidi is one to at least consider all options. And Puig has seven years in the league and has seen his fair share of the NL West opponents, having spent six seasons with Los Angeles.

    "With Farhan Zaidi, it never stops," Krukow said. "He's always looking to improve his club."

    Plus, Giants CEO Larry Baer recently said he wants to embrace the bat flips (or in this case, bat licks) and authentic personalities of the game as MLB tries to find better ways to market players. Puig certainly would fit right in that mold.

    Last season for the Dodgers and Cleveland Indians, Puig slashed .267/.327/.458 with 24 home runs and 84 RBI.
     
  14. BlueMouse

    BlueMouse 2020 World Champions

    Joined:
    Nov 2011
    Messages:
    12,445
    Likes Received:
    14,570
    Trophy Points:
    198
    LOL of course the Red Sox would do that salary dump. But the Dodgers, who won’t pay up $260 million for 7-8 years of an elite player are now going to pay $120 million for 1-year of an elite player and 3 years of a 1 WAR guy? I’m guessing our FO is nowhere close to taking on all that salary, because if they are their dumb as rocks.

    I can only picture Kershaw and Price eating up $65 million/ year to shore up the backend of our rotation. :whack:
     
  15. ColoradoKidWitGame

    ColoradoKidWitGame DSP Legend Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 2013
    Messages:
    11,710
    Likes Received:
    10,087
    Trophy Points:
    198
    To prove that ownership is not afraid to add high amounts of payroll, they will take on more terrible contracts to buy a great player without having to give up the prospect capital while showing in the process that they have no understanding for how free agency is supposed to work.
     
    darth550, irish, Finski and 1 other person like this.
  16. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 2011
    Messages:
    53,286
    Likes Received:
    40,914
    Trophy Points:
    278
    the snake oil salesman at it again
    "I expect, er, it looks like... it’s going to be well over, er, or somewhat over."
    amazing
    and now its "the team to start the postseason"
    whatev lol

    “The team we have now is not going to be the team we have to start the postseason. I expect that team, this year, it looks like it’s going to be well over the CBT, or somewhat over.”
    — Dodgers president and CEO Stan Kasten, on the team currently projected to fall below the luxury tax threshold
    LINK

    [​IMG]
     
    Finski likes this.
  17. 1988Blues

    1988Blues DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 2013
    Messages:
    3,508
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Dodgers brass defends lack of offseason moves amid fan frustration
    Stan Kasten, the Dodgers president, chief executive and part owner, took time to explain the Dodgers’ motivations and actions this offseason.

    by Bill Plaschke | Los Angeles Times — 5 January 2020

    The boos have finally gone deep.

    This Dodgers fans’ annual offseason frustration, which usually swirls around the dugout of Dave Roberts or desk of Andrew Friedman, has soared beyond both this winter and landed loudly and directly in the loftiest of chairs

    The blame has reached ownership. The October-worn fingers are being pointed at Guggenheim Baseball Management.

    After watching the lucrative franchise again fail to spend the money to land a fate-altering free agent — this time Gerrit Cole — many fans across several platforms openly wonder how badly Mark Walter and his partners want to win a World Series.

    Fans want to know why the team is not spending more of the $8.35 billion it’s getting in that botched TV contract that has resulted in the Dodgers going unseen in more than half of Los Angeles households.

    Many fans who continue to set Dodgers attendance records don’t feel like their incredible loyalty is being rewarded with a commensurate ownership commitment, and they want to know why.

    So I phoned Stan Kasten and asked him.

    Kasten is the Dodgers president, part-owner and Guggenheim’s on-site boss. He is the biggest hammer in the building, the loudest voice in the room, and, for better or worse, the symbol of every ownership decision.

    I gave him an opportunity to address Dodgers fans’ concerns about ownership, and he emphatically embraced it.

    “The L.A. Times’ characterization that everyone hates us has always been childish, superficial and wrong,” Kasten said of his ownership group.

    OK, so how does he define success? Does he believe seven division championships without a World Series championship is success?

    “There are metrics in business that are mostly private that we look at, and I’d say we feel successful there,” he said. “But there’s no question that all of us who are competitive, from every owner that has a piece of the team to the junior people in the front office, we’re laser-focused on winning the World Series. We really, we really need that.”

    But based on his offseason spending, it seems as if he’s satisfied with just winning the division every year and unwilling to write that extra check.

    “Some people may think that, I think that is silly and contrary to the facts,” he said. “I think there were three teams in all of baseball that spent more than us last year ... two of them didn’t make the postseason. So, to say we don’t spend enough, it is ludicrous.

    “Then you see teams with much smaller payrolls that make the postseason and even win the World Series. It’s obviously not about what you spend, it is about the moves you make, the decisions you make. I think questioning those things, criticizing those things, that’s absolutely fair. But just to say there’s a [payroll] number you need to hit and if you don’t hit it you’re not trying, that’s just silly.”

    Friedman made the strong decision to sign Cole, yet was outbid by the New York Yankees. Cole later claimed he always wanted to be a Yankee, but Scott Boras’ clients generally go to the biggest spenders, so folks wonder why Guggenheim didn’t just pay for the ace.

    “It is clear now, I think it was clear to us in the middle of the process, he wanted to be a Yankee, he just did,” Kasten said. “In retrospect, I think we were just the stalking horse to get a number he finally could get from a team he wanted to go to. I don’t have any quibble with his approach or with Scott’s approach, it was all very fair, but he wants to be somewhere, he got a lot of money to be where he wanted to be.”

    There was a Times story by Bill Shaikin last offseason that documented the club’s desire to keep the player payroll under the competitive balance tax, leading one to believe that there’s a mandate to that effect.

    “No,” Kasten said. “Two years ago, it was important, even though it was never a mandate. Last year was less important. This year, there’s no real need for that.

    “Last year we did reach out in a couple of respects that would have blown past the CBT, like Bryce Harper. ... Why it seems to be such a flashpoint here befuddles me. ... Obviously, the Gerrit Cole thing would have caused us to blow past it.”

    Kasten added that the roster is far from finalized and, when it is, they will probably spend beyond the CBT.

    “The team we have now is not going to be the team we have to start the postseason,” Kasten said. “I expect that team, this year, it looks like it’s going to be well over the CBT, or somewhat over.”

    Kasten also hinted at the potential for big names to still show up.

    “There are guys that we think could be difference makers and we have pursued them, we are continuing to pursue them, when there is an opportunity we will certainly jump at it,” he said. “I like stars too ... it’s cool, it’s fun, it’s fun for the team, it’s fun for the fans. But what’s most important is winning. And for the Dodgers, it’s winning year in and year out; that’s what I’m trying to build.”

    When he says “year in and year out,” that makes fans worry that his priority isn’t the stars who can capture October, but the consistency he nurtured while running the Atlanta Braves to 14 consecutive division titles that resulted in only one World Series championship.

    “To be fair, I have been with teams in my career that went to the World Series seven times, that’s not an accident, it’s also not something I’m embarrassed by,” Kasten said. “Of the six times those teams did not win, two lost in Game 7, and two lost in Game 6. That does not suggest to me a philosophy that is … amiss and needs to be completely revamped.”

    But this town is different. This market is starving. It demands a philosophy that will allow Friedman to spend whatever it takes to find the Kirk Gibson-type player who can end that 31-year drought.

    “There are a lot of players who went to the World Series, weren’t successful, until the one time they finally were, it’s not a thing you can predict very easily,” Kasten said. “Last year you were all fixated on us getting Bryce Harper. ... Not one of you were screaming, ‘You’ve got to re-sign Daniel Hudson’ [Washington’s postseason closer]. Two years ago, not one of you were saying, ‘You have to go out and make a trade for Steve Pearce’ [2017 World Series most valuable player with Boston].

    “I’m sorry, I just don’t agree with your thesis.”

    There should not even be a debate about the cost of player acquisitions when the Dodgers are getting rich on that lousy TV deal.

    “I’m not going to discuss the TV deal with you,” Kasten said. “I’m sorry ... I’m not going to do it.”

    But surely he knows that fans’ anger over what has essentially been an unprecedented six-year TV blackout, which Kasten blames on DirecTV, has led to the growing dislike for ownership. Surely he understands the general unrest by fans with the club’s general direction.

    “You have been painting a narrative for at least six years that fans hate us and we have, year in, year out, a record numbers of fans who just disagree with you,” Kasten said. “You’re just wrong about that.”

    Just because fans buy tickets doesn’t mean they’re buying the team’s vision. It appears that while they might rightfully appreciate the money ownership spent to restore Dodger Stadium, fans still don’t like what’s been done with the team.

    “For sure there are some fans who that feel that way, and a lot of people in the Twitterverse feel that way,” Kasten said. “But I don’t know that you’re right about that. Based on the fans that support us ... including this coming year … incredibly strong support and ticket sales … you keep trying to convince yourself that everyone hates us. I just think you’re wrong.”

    Yet, it appears something in the ownership philosophy has to change so the results on the field are ultimately different.

    “We won 106 games and came a couple of outs away from beating the team that won the World Series, that doesn’t suggest to me a system that needs to be completely torn apart,” Kasten said. “What about the renewed pipeline, the old Dodger value of a player pipeline that I think we’ve had a reasonable amount of success at rebuilding? How about the kids that are homegrown Dodgers? We have a payroll of $200 million. How can you call us cheap? It blows my mind.”

    Nobody believes they’re cheap, but many wonder whether they’re truly committed.

    “I’ve been blessed with an amazing set of opportunities in my life,” Kasten said. “This is the best thing, the most important thing, I’ve ever done, and this is the most fun I’ve ever had, to be able to do this with this brand, this franchise, in this market, is the best thing ever.

    “I couldn’t be happier to be here and more proud of what we’ve done so far, but we are far from done.”

    I hope so.
     
    Finski likes this.
  18. Fall Winslow

    Fall Winslow McRib

    Joined:
    Sep 2015
    Messages:
    25,538
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    228

    Lol!
     
    BlueMouse likes this.
  19. jpldodgers

    jpldodgers DSP Legend Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 2012
    Messages:
    20,580
    Likes Received:
    16,527
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Hard to read all of that bullshit without wanting to throw up.
     
    BlueMouse, rube, Finski and 1 other person like this.
  20. Gebbeth

    Gebbeth DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 2013
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    6,162
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Those are the words of a man that is completely and utterly self-satisfied.

    There is no further proof needed to show that the Guggs are completely out of touch and are just bleeding the organization for cash.
     
    BlueMouse, 1988Blues and Finski like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page