GAME THREAD DODGERS/NATIONALS

No baseball savvy necessary, just logic.
Ragging on Puig after he finally contributes to a win is similar to ragging on the Dodgers after they finally sweep a contending team.
So really if one is kinda dumb, then so is the other.
In fact, the Dodger org obviously has tons more credibility than Yasiel Puig the individual, so ragging on the Dodger org would be dumber.

 

In the words of the great Fred Flintstone.." Hooooooooold it! Hoooooooooooooooooold it! "
We're searching for some trade value here, dude

 

Update: 5 - 11 with a HR and making contact.

 

Nope. Not the way it is.
Nah, ragging on a particular player is focused and pointed to his abilities/ inabilities .The FO and their inadequecies,.agreed with or not, have their fingerprints over way more than Yasiel Puig popping up and K ing.
Puig's failings, if you will, are miniscule compared say, to the richest org in MLB with theirs, like failing against SF, like you've been mentioning.
It's like you can't see the forest for the trees thing.
But if we take over first, and keep the lead, ragging on the FO would be dumb. But since we haven't yet, it's blatantly moot. Or certainly should be.
But some people still rag on Puig, even though he is absolutely contributing...y' know-- dumb.
Like if individuals were still ragging on Turner and Greinke... it would seem to be pretty dumb, considering.
Whatever...could simply he hatred, too, as Rube wrote.
Spock logic.

 

Nice. Hopefully that will fool a team into taking him

 

Nope, because this isn't about the FO at all.
It's about you following up your fun police act regarding Puig with a post ragging on the actual team that's competing on the field producing a sweep.
And none of it's actually dumb.
Point being, you don't need people to tell you how to crack on the team's performance, just like I don't need you criticizing me or whomever else you were aiming at for doing the same regarding an individual's performance.
Fake ass fun police officer.
The hypocrisy.

 

Should they wait a week to call around?

 

You would know...

 

Nope again...damn, you can't handle anybody disagreeing with you, never could, no matter what morph you were in.
Wasn't criticism of you or anyone else, just a question on why you would still do it when the guy is coming around. Just a question... that's all it was. Not my fucking fault you took it the wrong way. It was explained to you, but I guess you have your agenda and must stick to it?
Who gives a fuck anyway?? You take people's responses and spin them to whatever you need to be "right" all the time. You never answer straight out, never.
Incapable.

 

You can disagree if you want and spin your responses as much as you like.
Bottom line coming from my end is your response to the Puig ragging was hypocritical.
You of all people who's always battling on behalf of your freedom to do and say whatever you want, when you want, and yet you don't see the hypocrisy in your trying to police who gets ragged on, how, and when?
You don't see the hypocrisy in your very next post about the team not having swept a contender since the " St. Louis Browns "?
Nice try.

 

It was a joke, you asshole. Did you see the date I wrote with it? I was joking with another poster for a laugh, that's all. He seemed to get it... but not you. Surprising. Such a fun guy.
And what are you anyway? The hypocrisy cop? Puig comes back and right away he helps us, and you still go at him, and I'm the hypocrit? And all I was doing was asking why. "Policing"...lol.
And it's policing to you, because you, plainly and simply, don't fucking get it all the time, even though you think you do. Not by a long shot.
Tell us, who should we hate/ love next? Let us know...

 

Here she comes, that's the drama queen I know.
I know what you said was a joke and we were joking on Puig as well, that's the point.
Your response to it was condescending and hypocritical.
That's the issue and nothing else.
This goes no deeper than you trying to play police while simultaneously doing the same as what others and myself were doing at the time.
You of all people who's always battling others on behalf of your freedom to do and say whatever you want, when you want.
And yeah, I'm calling you on it..I'm that guy.
I'm not one that's afraid of your long ass, dramatic diatribes.

 

Lol Love the commitment

 

You're stretchin' this pretty good, yourself, ain't ya...just as far as anybody else. Practice what you preach. Hypocrit, maybe?
And don't you think the "I'm the one calling you out" and the "not afraid" bullshit is a bit dramatic itself..but I understand why you are fairly skilled at it. Not too difficult to figure it out. Practice makes perfect, right?
Terrific skill you've got there...why, you've got me shiverin' in me boots, Jock.
Good hatin' over absolutely nothing, as usual with the likes of you. It comes so easily for you, doesn't it?
Just flows from your whole being, a natural.
The Roy Hobbs of hate.
Go ahead, have at it. I won't reply. You're fucking sickening now.

 

I'm not stretching anything, you're just backpedaling and stretching this back and forth.
I only got to the point of telling you that I'm calling you on it because of your own stretching, denial, and dramatic response in regards to what you did there.
The same stretching that you're doing now with all this " as usual by the likes of you " dance trying to divert attention away from what you did here...and in response to that I'll say that you're the most hypocritical, dramatic, " dish it, but can't take it " guy @ DSP.
No hate, reality..just like your condescending, hypocritical response regarding Puig.