Whether we agree or not, MLB and fans feel those parks have a little more novelty. Either that, or the Dodgers just haven't placed a bid. ? I really don't know.
Did McCourt even know what the ASG was? "Wait, so my best players play in a game, and I don't make any money?"
The Yankees did a good job of making a brand new stadium that is basically a replica of the first one. I've always been on the "just keep things the way they are" train, but I'd bet the Dodgers can build a brand new stadium at Chavez Ravine that is basically a replica of the first one, with 45-50K seats. Same 60's color schemes, wavy roof above the pavilions, yellow/orange/turquoise/baby blue seating. Same light blue walls, symmetrical dimensions, etc. Just a new facility in the same spot. Even do the built into a hill thing again. I'd like to see what they have planned (not that they have anything planned yet obviously) because the "Next 50" proposal was pretty bad. The landscaping and restaurants were cool, but those ugly museums behind the pavilions and shit looked so stupid.
Some of the aisles are too long without a way to get to the concessions. Removing some of those to make them shorter would be helpful.