Discussion in 'Los Angeles DODGERS' started by irish, Apr 2, 2017.
Even in war analytics rears its ugly head.
Not the Hitler from popular culture and the collective conscious.
While those other two killed more the boogeyman for most of the world is Hitler.
You just don't make pro Hitler comments.
You don't look into Hitler.
You don't spend time with his writings.
Because if you do you might start to sympathize.
Or worse yet... empathize.
And nobody wants to hear that except the people who wished Hitler faked his death and is living in a cryotank getting ready to take over the world alongside Disney.
Even I know you don't fuck with that.
Mao killed 75-100 million, so your numbers are a bit off. Also, US "legal" abortions have already killed 60 million people. Half were black or brown, so I guess that statistic is irrelevant to persons persons to wish to keep immigrant population low [such as Margaret Sanger & her agents].
Just imagine how many voters the Dems would have if they weren't dismembering those voters 18 years before they could cast a ballot?
Anyway ... nothing to see here... Carry on.
Pol Pot likes this.
Well, I tried to emphasize the key word here by capitizing it...WAR. Not abortions or a total dictatorship where people don't fight back like Mao.Those are not my numbers, I was just sharing info from a documentary called " A "A Look at Violence in History"" which gave these totals.
Maybe impossible these days, as already proved, but I meant no political football by posting it.
Having dinner with Hitler is an individual thing, especially for people who use their canine teeth, but there are hundreds, probably even thousands, just like me, who wouldn't even exist if not for Hitler.
That's not pro Hitler, just a cold, undebatable fact.
BZoo ... that came across as an address to you. I was more addressing the general consensus about war dead vs. genocide/all dead vs man's inhumanity to man dead. Frankly, I'm just glad you're back posting here, because I hadn't read you in a long time, and I like what you have to say.
I did see your distinction, but what you posted made me go into a rant about something that has been on my mind in another area code of polemics, so I went off. I hope you see that distinction now, and I did get your point.
A personal question, I realize, but you think most vegans are monorchid?
Yeah...Wu Tang Clan, right ?
Actually, Ghenghis Khan and The Golden Horde isn't a bad name for a group.
Some, but not all.
It's weird you'd ask. Wife's BFF ... her husband is vegan, and he is one-balled. Only found that out after ten years of knowing he was vegan, but assuming incorrectly that he was double-nutted.
I prefer 'Tamerlane & the Hittites" but yeah ... that name rocks as well.
his sac didn’t feel right in your mouth, did it?
Definitely the champ by %.
And go fuck yourself ...
after ten years of working on it.
-3 points if you had him in the death pool
Fuck that pretender Val Kilmer. Kirk was the real Doc Holliday.
Both were solid ... but I disagree. Kilmer took that part well beyond where Kirk was allowed to take it. If Kirk had made that film when Val did, and they were the same age ... he'd likely have exceeded him. But no ... Kilmer was unfuckinbelievable as Doc Holliday.
Superb actor, I concur. But I sure was blindsided by all this "he raped Natalie Wood" stuff that's suddenly flying all over the place. In this day & age, given all the other cases that have come to the surface, how in the hell (if this really happened) did the Golden Globes honor the guy two years ago?
Never knew that.
Separate names with a comma.