FEDIT POLITICS Thread

You sounding religious.

The enemy dont want socialism btw.
People who want socialism aren't the true enemy.
The ones that are using those who want socialism are the enemy. Once they get in power they will do away with these types of socialists. Just like in russia and China and every other red state.

The enemy is the enemy even if they are capitalists.

And ”all of us” don't want to help the poor.
Whatever you think about the failures of how welfare and government works for those that need to depend on the gov... It is by design.
The poor get poorer and the rich get richer is not accidental.

That is how socialism works too.
A free lunch always comes with a catch.
And its not the catch of the day.
Specially when you the new fish in a dirty blanket.
Just like the natives in reserve.
They also thought themselves to be the real Americans.
Their braves were all sent home by Mr. Freeman.
Mr. Freeman needs no job.
He needs no government.
He was born free. Not in a government institution and without the help of the dole.
And that is an entitlement only allowed to good neighbors.
Which begs the question.

 

Similar to me but I went with Chuck Baldwin.

There was this thing about Ronny... He liked to invite astrologers to the white house. That was kinda weird.

 

I can honestly say, I have never liked a single candidate that has been offered since I was voting age (bush sr was first).
Although, at the time I was cool with Clinton nutting on some fatty's dress while at work, so I guess that's the most I've ever liked a president.

 

You don't have to.
Voting is for statists anyway.

 

But not voting is a kind of message.
Low turnout should be an indicator that deligetimizes the system.
The power of the government should be tied to how many people actually vote.
Lower turnout should mean lower government power to do anything. There should be a system with the government's ability to tax is tied to voter turnout, regardless of who wins the election.
That would be awesome.

Now I wait for Ruven's mods to the idea with 384 different rules and cases to make it incomprehensible.

 

All those valley girl hot yoga chicks you are banging must be worth it.

I know diablo is just taking back the "im not religious but im spiritual" meme away from the former tians whose parents forced to go to church or college students who took a class about eastern cultures or someone into some mystical self empowerment trip that uses mantras massages oils crystals chakras martial arts dreamcatchers etc... Or maybe just someone into curry and weed.

 

the chappelle show was fucken hilarious
but i understand guys like you and finski not liking his style...
racists

 

I watched his Netflix special last night. I thought it was pretty funny, but didn't stand up to his work in classics like, "Half Baked."
I can also understand why some people had their feelings hurt.
I think it's fuckin hilarious when he makes fun of white people. I should probably work on being more butthurt about that.

 

I think that punching bag has "subjective theory of value" written on it.

 

Dude i'm working on it!
Old habits die hard.
I appreciate the message.
So i'll give you a little bit of classic.
One paragraph, just for old times sake.
------------------------------------------------------

Rule 1. There is no should.
Case ¹ Self evident.

Not voting is like not going to church.
Exactly the same thing.
You either practice the state religion and take part in its religious rites and light your votive candle to elect your guardian angels and you better pay your tribute... Or don't.
Nobody will judge you except your peers.
Low turnout is by design.
It legitimizes power.
The fewer the votes the more powerful they are.
A country that actually wants the majority of people to vote would do it differently.
That is not how the system works.
If the governments power to tax was tied to turnout then even fewer people would vote.
Then the incentive is to have low turnouts so the government can't flex their power.
At least from the people who don't want to be taxed further.