I'd say you can compare their first 6 years of service time, since that's what drafting a player really gets you.
^Which I pointed out in an earlier post, he's still developing although he's been struggling in the AFL but there is still time as we can all agree.
You can't play what if when we have no idea what Seager will do. Leave these questions until Seager actually makes it to the show and we see what he does.
We've seen the potential and reviews. I dont remember a Dodger prospect getting this kind of reviews since Kemp. That's something.
It's not like the Corey hype is entirely all of our creation, he's projected as a better player than his older brother who happens to be a solid major leaguer with the M's.
Konerko was the #2 prospect in 98 while Beltre was #3 Bills was #7 in 2006 (we had 9 top 100 prospects that year) Joel Guzman was #5 in 2005 Edwin Jackson #4 and Greg Miller #8 in 2004 We've had our share of top prospects. Just all of em suck
it was a good read... I like's someone's comment on twitter (I think it was truebluela) saying something like "all articles on Seager sound like they are written by a bias fan"... guy is a stud...