$257 million and counting

Please don't hijack b2b and my thread. If this was started "to appease the masses" because they wanted the other thread closed and couldn't avoid going into it, then get the fuck out of this one.

If you're going to over moderate, then play by your own rules.

 

Lol there you go, bud..i mean you've already said much of that in the past, so there's no need to hide behind " the masses " here. the initial title of the other thread was your tell. and i just call them how i see them in general..otherwise, it never ends. so with that said, i reject your challenge. we're gonna get it squared away every time you feel the need to come forth with the issue because, as you know, i'm an up front individual. i don't care who's on the other end. that's the way i was taught to handle myself/business/issues/etc.

now, if you really were " appealing to the masses " here, this thread would've been locked early yesterday. that's what was actually called for..not a senseless split of the threads. i mean you wouldn't even have to " issue a challenge " to me because it'd be locked and over. hell, you could've locked it after your last post there. i mean you don't go and create another thread if you have a problem with me going " on and on "..that make any sense?

and like i told you before..you can call it arguments, disagreements, and in-fighting if you like. i see it as discussion and the occasional banter with a F Youk or Chiefs..and when these developments happen, they're usually on topic. we aren't wasting time arguing over one another's posting styles, as you and i ( and others) do on occasion. the latter is what's unnecessary. this was not an instance in which " a flex of your power " was needed.

i find the idea that you should agree just to " keep the peace " pretty weak. disagreements don't cause chaos. disrespect causes chaos and i don't disrespect anybody personally. maybe some people just take it personally when others disagree with them..and that'd be their issue, not mine. from what i've seen there isn't much, if any, disrespect at all on this site. disagreements help further education/info on topics and actually keep the site's activity high. you should encourage that.

and i don't claim to " always be right " or call anybody stupid. maybe my carelessness about how others feel about me makes me seem smug, but at the same time..i'm 31yrs old. i'm a long way removed from high school, my man, and i'm not in need of buddies to the point where i'm just gonna agree with guys for the hell of it or lose sleep if i'm hated in an online forum.

i went out of my way to banter with FYouk about the topic of the thread..that's what went on here. a thread that was shitty from the outset and one that nobody was forced to continue to pay attention to if they didn't want to. but here it is, Youk's getting likes from posters ( including yourself), so some of you are rooting him on " against me " in this and that's fine. Lol let's just not mix up the issues here..there's really on one..that some of you don't like that i'm involved in this ( to which i obviously don't care).

and you and others may not like that i've responded here and will probably mumble to yourselves " he's just arguing again ", but again..that's you guy's issue, not mine. i wasn't disrespectful in the response and i was to the point. my challenge to you ( others) is to respect my approach because it's not hurting anybody or anything. if those people can't do that..oh well. those that are sensitive to the point where they can't handle being disagreed with, or can't successfully defend their points..those are issues that i can't concern myself with. and you too have the option of moving on here.

 

well said.

 

and btw, you used to compliment me on my approach and have an appreciation for it..

you seem to have gone soft, my man. no homo. either that or " the masses " are pulling you down.

 

[for agreeing with F YOUK]
Consider this a warning.

 

Oh, now you two agree???

 

the guy made a hell of a point, didn't he?

i say we just continue the banter in the thread we started in, Youk..

 

fyouk doesn't get it. the first rule is there are no rules. unless the mods say so.

 

the mods weren't a part of " the masses " that were bkitching in the other thread.

 

this thread still being open is so fuckin predictable as well..as is all the masses moving to the other thread that you created for me and FYouk.

i said my piece on this and stand behind every word of it. you asked me to move on without responding..let's see if you can practice what you preach.

 

I always thought the first DSP rule was to not be a douche.

 

well.." so fuckin predictable " on your part this time.

except you didn't just ask me to move on and let it go..you 1st took aim at me inaccurately, so what you have to understand is that you don't go to that point and then request that i pipe down and just accept it. wtf is that? no, you should expect me to say my piece in regards to your assessments when they involve me personally. those are reasonable expectations.

i already know that and the thread doesn't bother me in general..it just makes no sense for somebody that complains about banter to provide a thread..for more banter.

those complaints have to do with that thread currently being hijacked by " the masses "..the same bkitches that complained about us here are now in mine/FYouk's thread dickin around. how's that make any sense? control your masses.

if FYouk and myself were to begin a back and forth in that other thread it'd be a guarantee that bkitches would :bitching: there as well. point is, bkitches just can't mind their business.

likewise regarding the former and the latter. i just have to shine a light on the senselessness. it's a must.

 

that has nothing to do with it, fyouk was addressing the mods in his post

 

he was addressing you hijackers as well.

 

Both threads...lol.

That is all.