Look, YOU are the one that brought up the sell outs and packed house. NOT ME. If you couldn't give a fuck less then why are you talking about it in multiple posts? True enough, you didn't mention 'empty seats', you just pointed out that there were none in the opposition's ballpark, so what's the difference? You could easily stop me if you would kindly just SAY WHAT THE FUCK YOU MEAN. If you could care less about sell outs then why the fuck even mention them? If it isn't relevant to your point then why say it in two different posts? You sure made it SEEM relevant, otherwise you had no need to bring it up. Here's a hint, if you don't bring it up...then I can't argue it. Get it? Got it? Good!
I meant accessibility to go to the games Attendance isn't measured by how many people are left when the game ends
I don't see how fucking attendance has anything to do with the new Dodger Manager... The I'm right your wrong BS is tired...
It would do no good at all to attempt to explain it again, which I did with courtesy and manners more than once..because it would not serve your purpose. That's WTF you are only concerned with_ being right, even if you have to be ignorant and make up shit to do so. You are also the only person here who could actually make another understand and side with Sleepy Floyd when he was in his other past, less pleasant form...but I do, since your replies are...to use your phrasing..."in my book, ignorant".
meh, we'll see i still say it's kRapler's job to lose... In an incredible turn of events, the Washington Nationals have altered course and offered Dusty Baker – not Bud Black as previously reported – the job as manager. Why does this matter on a Dodgers website? Put simply, the guy the Nationals seemingly passed on is a better option for the Dodgers. That isn’t a particularly popular sentiment with Dodgers fans, but we know what Dusty Baker offers. For a team whose strength is easily its pitching, maximizing it with a manager like Bud Black seems like the way to go, especially coming off of years with Don Mattingly. Baker also comes across as more stubborn than most other candidates, and the last thing the organization needs is a rift between the front office and the manager it hires. Watch for rumors to start swirling of the Dodgers’ interest in Black in the coming week in ways they might not have with Baker. http://www.dodgersnation.com/dodgers-rumors-nationals-change-course-hire-baker/2015/11/03/
Kindly show me what I "made up". As far as being 'ignorant', you brought up the sell outs, etc., in two separate posts. Then you said it had nothing to do with sellouts. So again, why the fuck bring it up if it's not relevant to your point? Seriously, show me what I made up.
i thought san diego fired black oh, right... bud black wow racist Dodgers interview Dave Roberts by Anthony Irwin | Dodgers Nation — 3 minutes ago The Los Angeles Dodgers’ interviewing process is starting to take shape. The latest candidate to take his turn sitting in front of Andrew Friedman and the rest of the front office: Dave Roberts. Roberts will probably be pretty popular and might turn into a leading candidate thanks to his prior history with the club as a player from 2002 to 2004. Fox’s Ken Rosenthal is reporting the interview has already taken place: Roberts, a former outfielder best known for stealing second in 2004 during the Boston Red Sox’s World Series run, has remained involved with baseball since his retirement in some fashion. One knock some might have on Roberts is his lack of managerial experience. He’s been a first base coach and was Bud Black’s bench coach this past season. He lost his lone game as manager after Black was fired, then was replaced by interim manager Pat Murphy.
Roberts is interesting. He'd get a lot more and instant respect from the team than Cabana boy Kapler will.